Splet10. apr. 2024 · Analysing the recent amendments: Pros. Cons. These amendments remove social media firms’ immunity if they decide to continue publishing ‘fake news’ that has been identified as such. Platforms are free to keep content even after it is flagged as ‘fake news’. The fact-checking setup will be. Credible. Splet17. jan. 2024 · PerfectFiling. -. January 17, 2024. 2. 30. In this shreya singhal vs union of india case summary, a court decision related to freedom of expression. The Court agreed …
Case Summary: Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India thr. Secretary ...
Splet24. mar. 2015 · The landmark case of Shreya Singhal v Union of India (2015) is a landmark case that plays a very important role in the Indian legal system. The case revolves … Splet11. jun. 2024 · The case analysis is written by Deepika, pursuing BALLB from IIMT & SCHOOL OF LAW, GGSIPU, Delhi.. Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India AIR 2015 SC 1523 … di izinkan
Case Shreya Singhal VS Union Of India Case Summary
Splet23. jul. 2024 · Facts: Petitioner (hereinafter referred to as P), an independent candidate contested the election for the Eranad seat in the Kerala Legislative Assembly held on 13/04/2011. He lost to Respondent (hereinafter referred to as R), who was the Congress-led United Democratic Front candidate. Splet12. apr. 2024 · Shreya Singhal vs Union of India AIR 2015 SC 1523. Section 2(10) of the Draft Digital Data Protection Bill, 2024. Draft Rules did not use the word ‘permissible’ in the definition of online games or online gaming intermediaries. Rule 2(1)(qf) Rule 4A(3)(a) Rule 3(1)(B)(12) Rule 4A(12) Splet04. avg. 2024 · This case comment on “Shreya Singhal v Union of India [1]“ prepared by Eshanee Bhattacharya is one of the landmark cases where the Supreme Court of India … di jacuzzi