WebISSUE: Whether the right to life under Article 21 is limited only to protection of limb or faculty or does it go further and embrace something more? Whether or not a person … WebJul 9, 2024 · In ["Francis Coralie Mullin Vs Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi & Ors." (1981) 1 SCC. 608], the Supreme Court held that "every limb or faculty" that helps enjoy life must be protected by ...

Right to Life (Article 21) - Indian Polity Notes - BYJU

WebGet free access to the complete judgment in Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, Union Territory Of Delhi And Others on CaseMine. WebPramod Singla Vs. Union of India & Ors., Crl.A. No.-001051-001051 / 2024. ... 28. Subsequently, in the case of Francis Coralie Mullin v. W.C. Khambra & Ors.5, a Division Bench of this Court considered the principles laid down in the judgment of Jayanarayan Sukul (Supra), and while it agreed with the principles of the above mentioned case, it ... the oak cliff assembly

Francis Coralie vs. Union Territory of Delhi: Case-Comment

Web13. In Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi1 this Court acknowledged that the right to life guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution includes the right to live with dignity which includes, inter alia, nutrition, clothing and shelter - all of which require some finances. Provision for these basic necessities can ... WebIn the case of Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, Union Territory for Delhi, 1981, the Supreme Court found, “no prisoners’ right to have interviews with members of his family and friends as constitutionally valid under Articles 14 and 21 unless its reasonable, fair and just”. In the case of P. Nedumaran v. WebThe petitioner, therefore, preferred a petition in this Court under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of sub-clauses (i) 522 and (ii) of clause 3(b) of the Conditions of … michigan state parks passport